Human Emulation - I-Sobot

Forward Walking Test

We tested the walking motion of a I-Sobot with no modifications or sensors using only the
preprogrammed walking motion provided by the manufacturer.  The I-Sobot had to walk a distance equal
to three body heights (6.5 inches X 3 = 19.5 inches).  If the robot began to veer to one side, we made no
corrections and just let the robot keep on walking.
All rights reserved.
RobotServicesGroup.com
Used
NOTE:  These robots are not meant for children.  All of the humanoid robot models discussed on this website use
powerful servos that can pinch or even crush your fingers if you are not careful.  Consult the recommended minimum
age from the manufacturer before allowing children to use any of these robots.
INTERPRETATION:

The I-Sobot walked a distance equal to three body heights (or 19.5 inches) in an average time of 24.9 seconds, with an average
variance from a straight line of 1.86 inches, which is 29% of its body height.  The robot took 33.8 steps on average to complete the
test.  Consider that it takes an average human approximately 4 seconds to walk three body heights, taking just 8 steps.  
That
means that the I-Sobot is 6.2 times slower than a human, and takes 4.2 times as many steps to cover the same relative distance.
 

The I-Sobot is roughly twice as fast as the Robonova-1 we previously tested.  Despite having slower and weaker servos, the
I-Sobot whipped through the walking test in half the time.  It was able to do this thanks to the continuous walking cycle that comes
preprogrammed on the I-Sobot, but not on the Robonova-1.

The I-Sobot also comes with a gyro included as standard equipment.  This may have helped it achieve a lower variance in the
straight line walking test.  However, the bigger impact was probably due to the I-Sobot's wide feet which provide extra stability that
the Robonova-1 lacks.  The I-Sobot only varied 29% of its body height from the center line, but the Robonova-1 wandered 45% of
its body height on average.  The I-Sobot clearly does a better job of mimicing human motions than the Robonova-1 in this test.
   
Time in
seconds
  Variance
from center
in inches
 
Number
of steps
 
Video Links
 
Video Angle
 
Test 1
  24.5
  2.50 right
  33
  Walk 1
  High Side View
 
Test 2
  25.0
  1.50 left
  34
  Walk 2
  High Side View
 
Test 3
  25.8
  2.50 right
  35
  Walk 3
  High Side View
 
Test 4
  25.9
  0.00
  34
  Walk 4
  High Side View
 
Test 5
  25.8
  4.75 left
  35
  Walk 5
  3/4 view
 
Test 6
  24.9
  3.25 left
  34
  Walk 6
  3/4 View
 
Test 7
  25.7
  0.50 right
  35
  Walk 7
  3/4 View
 
Test 8
  25.0
  1.00 left
  34
  Walk 8
  3/4 View
 
Test 9
  24.5
  1.25 right
  33
  Walk 9
  Front View
 
Test 10
  25.0
  2.50 left
  34
  Walk 10
  Front View
 
Test 11
  24.2
  2.50 right
  33
  Walk 11
  Front View
 
Test 12
  24.4
  1.50 left
  33
  Walk 12
  Front View
 
Test 13
  24.4
  1.25 left
  33
  Walk 13
  Overhead View
 
Test 14
  25.0
  1.50 left
  34
  Walk 14
  Overhead View
 
Test 15
  24.2
  0.75 right
  33
  Walk 15
  Overhead View
 
Test 16
  24.2
  1.00 right
  33
  Walk 16
  Overhead View
 
Test 17
  25.7
  3.25 left
  35
  Walk 17
  Low Side View
 
Test 18
  24.1
  1.00 right
  33
  Walk 18
  Low Side View
 
Test 19
  24.2
  0.50 right
  33
  Walk 19
  Low Side View
 
Test 20
  24.8
  4.25 right
  34
  Walk 20
  Low Side View
 
                       
Best
  24.1
  0.00
  33
         
Worst
  25.9
  4.75 left
  35
         
                       
Average
  24.9
  1.86
  33.8
         
Standard Deviation
  0.6
  1.28
  0.8
         
% of body height
  n/a
  29%
  n/a
         
                       
Human Average
  4.0
  n/a
  8
         
                       
Test 1 was pretty typical with a
2.50 inch variance to the right
Test 4 finished with no variance
CONCLUSION:

The I-Sobot performed much better than the Robonova-1 in the walking test, and fared about the same in the 180 degree turn
test.  Considering that the I-Sobot costs less than $250 and the Robonova-1 is three times more expensive near $900, the
results appear surprising on the surface.  The real reasons behind the I-Sobot's superior performance are the continuous
walking cycle that came preprogrammed with the robot, the gyro that comes as standard equipment, and the wide feet for better
stability.
   
Time in
seconds
 
Number of
steps
 
Variance
side-to-side
in inches
 
Variance
front-to-back
in inches
 
Turn
Direction
 
Video
Links
 
Video
Angle
   
Test 1
  18.0
  14
  4.75
  4.00
  Right
  Turn 1
  Front
   
Test 2
  16.1
  13
  4.50
 
3.50
  Right
  Turn 2
  Front
   
Test 3
  14.4
  12
  5.00
 
3.50
  Left
  Turn 3
  Front
   
Test 4
  14.0
  11
  4.75
 
3.25
  Left
  Turn 4
  Front
   
Test 5
  14.8
  12
  5.00
 
4.00
  Right
  Turn 5
  3/4 view
   
Test 6
  15.5
  13
  4.00
 
4.50
  Right
  Turn 6
  3/4 view
   
Test 7
  14.7
  12
  5.00
 
3.00
  Left
  Turn 7
  3/4 view
   
Test 8
  14.9
  12
  5.00
 
2.50
  Left
  Turn 8
  3/4 view
   
Test 9
  14.8
  12
  5.00
 
4.50
  Right
  Turn 9
  Low Side
   
Test 10
  15.2
  12
  4.50
 
3.00
  Right
  Turn 10
  Low Side
   
Test 11
  14.7
  12
  4.50
 
3.75
  Left
  Turn 11
  Low Side
   
Test 12
  14.5
  12
  5.50
 
2.75
  Left
  Turn 12
  Low Side
   
Test 13
  15.4
  12
  4.50
 
3.75
  Right
  Turn 13
  High Side
   
Test 14
  14.4
  12
  4.25
 
3.50
  Right
  Turn 14
  High Side
   
Test 15
  13.8
  11
  4.25
 
3.00
  Left
  Turn 15
  High Side
   
Test 16
  14.1
  11
  5.00
 
3.00
  Left
  Turn 16
  High Side
   
Test 17
  15.2
  12
  4.50
 
4.25
  Right
  Turn 17
  Overhead
   
Test 18
  16.3
  13
  4.50
 
3.50
  Right
  Turn 18
  Overhead
   
Test 19
  15.5
  12
  5.25
 
2.00
  Left
  Turn 19
  Overhead
   
Test 20
  14.6
  12
  5.50
 
3.00
  Left
  Turn 20
  Overhead
   
               
 
               
Best
  13.8
  11
  4.00
 
2.00
               
Worst
  18.0
  14
  5.50
 
4.50
               
               
 
               
Average
  15.0
  12.1
  4.76
 
3.41
               
Standard Deviation
  1.0
  0.72
  0.41
 
0.66
               
% of body height
  n/a
  n/a
  73.3%
 
52.5%
               
               
 
               
Human Average
  2.0
  3.0
  16.35
 
15.20
               
% of body height
  n/a
  n/a
  23.4%
  21.7%
               
180 Degree Turn Test

The I-Sobot lacks hip servos, just like the Robonova-1, so the I-Sobot uses the same kind of dragging motion to turn.  The only
advantage the I-Sobot has is that its turning motion is continuous, whereas the Robonova-1 stops in between each turn.  This
should theoretically allow the I-Sobot to turn faster.  Check the results below to find out what really happened.
INTERPRETATION:

The I-Sobot completed the 180 Degree Turn in an average time of 15.0 seconds, with an average variance side-to-side of 4.76 inches, which
is 73.3% of its body height, with an average variance front-to-back of 3.41 inches, which is 52.5% of its body height.  The robot took 12.1
steps on average to complete the test.  Consider that it takes an average human approximately 2 seconds to turn 180 Degrees, taking just 3
steps.  
That means that the I-Sobot is 7.5 times slower than a human, and takes 4.0 times as many steps.  

Despite having a continuous walking motion, the I-Sobot performed almost exactly the same as the Robonova-1.  Turning 180 degrees is
difficult for any robot to do without having hip or waist servos.  We plan to test other robots in the future that have hip servos, so it will be very
interesting to see the difference in performance.
Test 3 - 5.00 inches side-to-side
and 3.50 inches front-to-back
VARIANCE TEST:

The photos below show the measurements for a sample of our variance tests. All tests were measured the same way
Test 10 - 4.50 inches side-to-side
and 3.00 inches front-to-back
FREE Robot Test Drive

Would you like to try out the
I-Sobot or the Robonova-1 for
yourself?  Click
here to sign up for
a FREE Test Drive from the
comfort of your own home.